A Survey of the Old Testament Law--Numbers 22-24 (Part 2)

Numbers 22:36-41—36 Now when Balak heard that Balaam was coming, he went out to meet him at the city of Moab, which is on the border at the Arnon, the boundary of the territory. 37 Then Balak said to Balaam, "Did I not earnestly send to you, calling for you? Why did you not come to me? Am I not able to honor you?" 38 And Balaam said to Balak, "Look, I have come to you! Now, have I any power at all to say anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that I must speak." 39 So Balaam went with Balak, and they came to Kirjath Huzoth. 40 Then Balak offered oxen and sheep, and he sent some to Balaam and to the princes who were with him. 41 So it was, the next day, that Balak took Balaam and brought him up to the high places of Baal, that from there he might observe the extent of the people. Balaam was indeed a prophet, one through whom God spoke. And Balak thought Balaam was coming to him to bring him good news that he had cursed the Israelites. So he made a great sacrifice, while at the same time being miffed that Balaam had not come sooner. But what does Balaam tell Balak? "Look, I have come to you! Now, have I any power at all to say anything? The word that God puts in my mouth, that I must speak." Even this pagan spoke only what YHVH put in his mouth. He knew that YHVH was the Almighty God over all creation, and despite living in the pagan land of Moab, he knew that Chemosh could not work the wonders that YHVH could do. Could Chemosh put a message in a prophet’s mouth? Could Chemosh cause a messenger to stand before a donkey and turn him to the side? Could Chemosh cause that donkey to talk? No, he could do none of these things. And Balaam knew this. But YHVH could do these things, and Balaam also knew this. 

This was one of the problems the people of Israel faced in the land where they were. They were beset on every side by nations who worshipped idols. Edom with Qos, and Egypt with its pantheon, to the south. The Amorites to the east with their pantheon. The Hittites with their pantheon and the Ammonites with Molech to the north. The Moabites with Chemosh. The Jebusites with Sedeq and Salem. Then you had the Ba'al worship going on in Canaan, the land they were to settle in. And you can see they were surrounded by pagan worship. And it continued until the days of the early church. The Greeks had their gods, the Romans had theirs (which were just Greek gods co-opted by Rome). Paul would tell the men of Athens, who had built an altar to “An Unknown God”, that they worshipped Him even though they did not know Him (Acts 17:23). It was better, to the Athenian mind, to set up shrines to gods they didn’t know than to offend them by leaving them out of their pantheon.

So it was, the next day, that Balak took Balaam and brought him up to the high places of Baal, that from there he might observe the extent of the people. Much like Satan took Jesus high upon a hill that he may show the Son of God all the kingdoms he would give Him, if only He would worship the serpent of old. Well did our Lord call him “a liar and the father of it” (John 8:44). And here, Balak shows that he too is a liar, showing this man who spoke the truth from God all the land that Balak would rule over if only Balaam would curse the people of Israel. A thought that would be echoed by our Adversary in Matthew 4:9—“All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.” Satan is indeed the god of this world (2nd Corinthians 4:4), the Prince of the power of the air (Ephesians 2:2), the Accuser of the Brethren (Revelation 12:10). But that is the limit of his power—this world. He wanted Jesus to lay claim to this world and all its limitations, rather than the Kingdom of His Father, and all the precious souls with it. He wanted Jesus to worship him instead of His Father. Which is what Balak was telling Balaam here. “Don’t listen to what YHVH says. Curse these people and look at all the land we will possess!”

Numbers 23:1-10—1 Then Balaam said to Balak, "Build seven altars for me here, and prepare for me here seven bulls and seven rams." 2 And Balak did just as Balaam had spoken, and Balak and Balaam offered a bull and a ram on each altar. 3 Then Balaam said to Balak, "Stand by your burnt offering, and I will go; perhaps the LORD will come to meet me, and whatever He shows me I will tell you." So he went to a desolate height. 4 And God met Balaam, and he said to Him, "I have prepared the seven altars, and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." 5 Then the LORD put a word in Balaam's mouth, and said, "Return to Balak, and thus you shall speak." 6 So he returned to him, and there he was, standing by his burnt offering, he and all the princes of Moab. 7 And he took up his oracle and said: "Balak the king of Moab has brought me from Aram, from the mountains of the east. 'Come, curse Jacob for me, and come, denounce Israel!' 8 How shall I curse whom God has not cursed? And how shall I denounce whom the LORD has not denounced? 9 For from the top of the rocks I see him, and from the hills I behold him; there! A people dwelling alone, not reckoning itself among the nations. 10 Who can count the dust of Jacob, or number one-fourth of Israel? Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my end be like his!" No matter how many times Balaam went to God to receive a word, it always came back the same. “You shall not curse Israel”. One cannot undo what God has done. We do not have that much power or authority. If God says something is done, it is done. If He says something is going to happen, it is going to happen. We obey kings and presidents because of their position. We yield to law enforcement officers because of the power they hold. If any of these says “so let it be done”, it should be done. How much more should we listen to and obey the Creator of everything! And not only that, should we also not believe Him? He told Abram in Genesis 12:3—“I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you.” What we see Balaam speak to Balak may not be the extent of everything God said to Balaam. He may very well have included these words He spoke to Abram. 

And God met Balaam, and he [Balaam] said to Him [God], "I have prepared the seven altars, and I have offered on each altar a bull and a ram." So Balaam asked Balak to prepare seven altars. Balak most likely thought they were to be altars to Chemosh, but Balaam meant them for sacrifice to YHVH. Doesn't that so often happen? What the ungodly mean for bad, God turns it around and uses it to fulfill His own plans? Jacob snatching the blessing from Esau. Joseph’s brothers selling him to the Midianites. In fact, after Joseph and his brothers bury Jacob and his brothers think the worst is about to happen and that Joseph will exact revenge, he tells them “But as for you, you meant evil against me; but God meant it for good, in order to bring it about as it is this day, to save many people alive” (Genesis 50:20). And here, what Balak means for evil, God means it for good. 

9 “A people dwelling alone, not reckoning itself among the nations. 10 Who can count the dust of Jacob, or number one-fourth of Israel?” The Apostolic Bible Polyglot renders verse 9: “For from the top of mountains I shall see him; and from hills I shall pay attention to him. Behold, a people alone shall dwell, and among nations they shall not be reckoned together.” The Jewish Publication Society translation says: “For from the top of the rocks I see him, and from the hills I behold him: lo, it is a people that shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations.” Different translations render this verse differently than others, and the divide is about 50/50. This last rendering is closes to the original intent. Balaam had to be on the top of the highest rocky jut to see the vastness of the nearly one million people. Yet this people would live “alone”, as they would be a self-contained group. And they would not be “reckoned among the nations”; they would not be as the other nations, worshipping false gods and being part of their rituals (for the time being, anyway)—they would be holy, set apart to God for His purposes.

“Who can count the dust of Jacob, or number one-fourth of Israel?” “Just one quarter of their population has to be a quarter of a million people! Who can fathom such a great nation!” What was considered to be one of the surest signs of blessing from a deity in the Middle East at this time? Children. So obviously the people of Israel, as the thought went, must have been highly blessed to have had so many children that their numbers would swell, even in the desert. The same could be said of national Israel today. Is there a nation of Hittites? Of Moabites? Of Jebusites or Edomites? All these nations have gone under and exist only in books and in studies of archaeology. Yes, Egypt remains, but the Amorites and Canaanites are gone, save for a few pockets here and there. Yet “Who can count the dust of Jacob?” Did not God tell Abram that his descendants would be “as the dust of the earth; so that if a man could number the dust of the earth, then your descendants also could be numbered” (Genesis 13:16). Next time you go to the beach, pick up a handful of sand. Then count the number of grains of sand, if you are able. That is how numerous the descendants of Abram have been, are, and will be. As I said before, if God says something is going to happen, it’s going to happen.

Numbers 23:11-24—11 Then Balak said to Balaam, "What have you done to me? I took you to curse my enemies, and look, you have blessed them bountifully!" 12 So he answered and said, "Must I not take heed to speak what the LORD has put in my mouth?" 13 Then Balak said to him, "Please come with me to another place from which you may see them; you shall see only the outer part of them, and shall not see them all; curse them for me from there." 14 So he brought him to the field of Zophim, to the top of Pisgah, and built seven altars, and offered a bull and a ram on each altar. 15 And he said to Balak, "Stand here by your burnt offering while I meet the LORD over there." 16 Then the LORD met Balaam, and put a word in his mouth, and said, "Go back to Balak, and thus you shall speak." 17 So he came to him, and there he was, standing by his burnt offering, and the princes of Moab were with him. And Balak said to him, "What has the LORD spoken?" 18 Then he took up his oracle and said: "Rise up, Balak, and hear! Listen to me, son of Zippor! 19 God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should repent. Has He said, and will He not do? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good? 20 Behold, I have received a command to bless; He has blessed, and I cannot reverse it. 21 He has not observed iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen wickedness in Israel. The LORD his God is with him, and the shout of a King is among them. 22 God brings them out of Egypt; He has strength like a wild ox. 23 For there is no sorcery against Jacob, nor any divination against Israel. It now must be said of Jacob and of Israel, 'Oh, what God has done!' 24 Look, a people rises like a lioness, and lifts itself up like a lion; it shall not lie down until it devours the prey, and drinks the blood of the slain." 

"Please come with me to another place from which you may see them; you shall see only the outer part of them, and shall not see them all; curse them for me from there." Balak thought that by seeing their entire number, Balaam was afraid to curse Israel for their vast numbers. He thought that if he saw just a tiny fraction of them, he would be more inclined to lay a curse on them. So he takes the prophet to the top of Mt. Pisgah, also known as Mt. Nebo. From here, Balaam could see a small sliver of the people, and Balak thought that here his wishes would come to fruition. But, alas…

“God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should repent.” So many skeptics and liberals and progressives try to use this verse to say that Jesus was not God. “It says in Numbers that God is not a son of man! How can Jesus be God if He is called ‘The Son of Man’?” The fact that this question even needs to be answered is frustrating. Balaam is not talking here about Jesus. This is not the Book of Mormon where things were written into the text in 1820 in order to fit in with biblical history. Balaam here is talking about the only One the Jews knew as God, that being the Father. Jesus had not been born yet, and would not be for another 1400 or so years. So no, when Balaam said this, Jesus, even though He did exist (John 17:5), had not yet become incarnate and was not, yet, Son of Man. (There is debate about if He was Son of God at this time, but we will leave that to the philosophers). What Balaam is saying here is this: That God is not a man (sorry not sorry, Mormons), and He was not born of a man, but that He has existed forever (Psalm 92:1), that He is dependent upon nobody for His existence, that He does not change His mind 100 times in a day as man does.

“But doesn’t it say in some places, like before the flood and after the repentance of the people of Nineveh, that God repented (Genesis 6:6 (KJV); Jonah 3:10)?” And here we go again. Answering questions from people who have never read or studied the Bible and who do not want anything to do with reading or studying the Bible. Does God know the end from the beginning? Absolutely. Isaiah 46:9-10—“9 Remember the former things of old, for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like Me, 10 declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times things that are not yet done, saying, 'My counsel shall stand, And I will do all My pleasure'” So why would God change His mind? “Then why do we pray?” EM Bounds said in his book “The Reality of Prayer”, 

The law of prayer, the right to pray, rests on sonship. “Our Father” brings us into the closest relationship to God. Prayer is the child’s approach, the child’s plea, the child’s right. It is the law of prayer that looks up, that lifts up the eye to “Our Father, Who art in Heaven.” Our Father’s house is our home in Heaven. Heavenly citizenship and heavenly homesickness are in prayer; Prayer is an appeal from the lowness, from the emptiness, from the need of earth, to the highness, the fullness and to the all-sufficiency of Heaven. Prayer turns the eye and the heart heavenward with a child’s longings, a child’s trust and a child’s expectancy. To hallow God’s Name, to speak it with bated breath, to hold it sacredly, this also belongs to prayer.

Prayer is how we conform our will to God’s will. It is how we seek God for how to live our lives according to the way He wants us to live. It is not so we can get great riches and fame; it is not so we can make a happy life for ourselves according to how the worlds views happiness. True happiness and joy come from being accepted in the Beloved (Ephesians 1:6)—not by health, wealth or prosperity.

“God is not a man, that He should lie.” And of course we know that God cannot—not merely that He does not—lie. He cannot lie (Hebrews 6:18; Titus 1:2). That should be to us the most comforting of all of God’s attributes—that He is faithful and just, even when we are not faithful. We lie, we cheat, we defraud our neighbor. And He knows this. And yet He is patient with us. Oh, the eternal patience of God! We get angry and yell at our children when they misbehave. We get angry when someone cuts us off in traffic. We talk ill of others when they do us wrong. Yet God—they very God to whom we owe our lives—does not cast us aside when we do those things that grieve His heart. In his song “Unchanging One”, Todd Agnew sings:

You know when I wake, when I rise

When I pray, when I curse You

And You love me the same

And You know when I stumble and fall

And You're there through it all

The only Unchanging One

And let’s clear up one more fallacy: The “Ransom Theory” of the Atonement. This is the mistaken belief that God gave up His Son as a payment to Satan to let His people free. This theory says that Adam and Eve’s sin caused all of humanity to belong to Satan, which is far from the truth. According to this theory Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross was a trick played out by God, knowing that Jesus would rise from the dead. God said to Satan that He would give him a sacrifice for our sins, but then He yanked that sacrifice away with the Resurrection. Robin Collins describes it thusly:

“Essentially, this theory claimed that Adam and Eve sold humanity over to the Devil at the time of the Fall; hence, it required that God pay the Devil a ransom to free us from the Devil's clutches. God, however, tricked the Devil into accepting Christ's death as a ransom, for the Devil did not realize that Christ could not be held in the bonds of death. Once the Devil accepted Christ's death as a ransom, this theory concluded, justice was satisfied and God was able to free us from Satan's grip.”

First of all, this theory makes God a liar and deceiver, and He is neither of those things. Second, God owed Satan nothing.  This theory was espoused by Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, St. Basil the Great, and even such great theologians as Athanasius and Augustine. You even see it played out in “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” by CS Lewis. Here are some quotes from the early proponents of this theory.

Origen:

“But to whom did He give His soul as a ransom for many? Surely not to God. Could it, then, be to the Evil One? For he had us in his power, until the ransom for us should be given to him, even the life (or soul) of Jesus, since he (the Evil One) had been deceived, and led to suppose that he was capable of mastering that soul, and he did not see that to hold Him involved a trial of strength greater than he was equal to.”...“It is clearly shown that a certain spirit, from his own (free) will and choice, elected to deceive, and to work a lie, in order that the Lord might mislead the king to his death, for he deserved to suffer.”

Gregory of Nyssa:

“In order to secure that the ransom in our behalf might be easily accepted by him who required it, the Deity was hidden under the veil of our nature, that so, as with ravenous fish, the hook of the Deity might be gulped down along with the bait of flesh.”

However, William Lane Craig rebuffs this theory (as did the church as of the writings of Anselm in about 1000AD):

“As Origen’s statement revealed, the fathers typically thought of this arrangement between God and Satan as a very clever ruse on God’s part. He tricked Satan into making this exchange. You see, as the second person of the Trinity, the Son of God could not possibly have been held captive by Satan. But by his incarnation – by becoming a man – Christ appeared to be just as weak and vulnerable as other human beings who were under Satan’s control, and it was only after the captives had been freed by Satan that the Son of God manifested his full divine power by rising from the dead and breaking the bonds of death and hell and thus escaping from Satan's power.”

God did not use deceit to buy us out of Hell. His Son came as a substitute for us, paid the penalty we owed, bore the punishment we deserved, and God laid His hands on Him and transferred our sins to Him, and gave us His righteousness. 1st Peter 2:24—Who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness—by whose stripes you were healed. Hebrews 9:28—Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many. He bore our sins with His one sacrifice, took His blood into the Holy of Holies in the Heavens, made propitiation for us and cleansed us from all unrighteousness!

Drooping souls no longer mourn/Jesus still is precious;

If to Him you now return/Heaven will be propitious;

Jesus now is passing by/Calling wanderers near Him;

Drooping souls, you need not die/Go to Him and hear Him!

He has pardons full and free/Drooping souls to gladden;

Still He cries—“Come unto me/Weary, heavy-laden!”

Though your sins, like mountains high/Rise, and reach to heaven,

Soon as you on Him rely/All shall be forgiven.

Precious is the Saviour’s name/Dear to all that love Him;

He to save the dying came/Go to Him and prove Him;

Wandering sinners, now return/Contrite souls believe Him!

Jesus calls you, cease to mourn/Worship Him; receive Him.

(“Heaven is Propitious” by Thomas Hastings)

“He has not observed iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen wickedness in Israel.” “Whoa! What about all the times Israel grumbled in the wilderness and incurred His anger?” Yes, this is a difficult passage on first glance. That is why we do not simply do a cursory reading of Scripture, but exposit it so we can better understand it. This is not talking about individuals, since we have seen in Leviticus all the things that needed to be done to expiate sins and the Day of Atonement. Here Balaam is talking about Israel as a nation—the nation has not turned to other gods, the nation has not cried out to Ba'al or Chemosh. As a nation, Israel is righteous before God, and they belong to Him. Have individuals in the nation sinned? Yes. Have individuals in Israel complained when things didn’t go their way? Yes. Has the nation of Israel ceased to be a nation before Him; has Israel as a nation turned to worship other gods or commit other abominations that the surrounding nations have done? No. That is an important distinction. That of the difference between the nation of Israel and individuals in the nation. So what does this mean for us as Christians? The key phrase we need to remember is “in Christ”. If we are saved, we are in Christ. Romans 8:1—There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. 1st Corinthians 1:30—But of Him you are in Christ Jesus. Galatians 3:28—There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Ephesians 2:13—But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. John 17:21—“That they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us.” “So we are in Christ; what does this have to do with this passage in Numbers?” Only everything!

God saw no iniquity in the nation of Israel. Does God see any iniquity in Christ? So if we are in Christ, will God see iniquity in us? Were not our sins forgiven as Jesus hung on the tree? Was He not offered up as a substitute for us? Galatians 3:13—Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us. 2nd Corinthians 5:17, 21—Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new…He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came to Earth, took our sins upon Himself, gave His life and His righteousness to us, and took upon Himself the curse and the sin that was ours. He was not a ransom paid to Satan then snatched away by a deceitful God. He was our Substitute.

Part 3 next week

Jesus Christ is Lord.

Amen.

A Survey of the Old Testament Law--Numbers 22-24 (Part 1)

Numbers 22:1-6—1 Then the children of Israel moved, and camped in the plains of Moab on the side of the Jordan across from Jericho. 2 Now Balak the son of Zippor saw all that Israel had done to the Amorites. 3 And Moab was exceedingly afraid of the people because they were many, and Moab was sick with dread because of the children of Israel. 4 So Moab said to the elders of Midian, "Now this company will lick up everything around us, as an ox licks up the grass of the field." And Balak the son of Zippor was king of the Moabites at that time. 5 Then he sent messengers to Balaam the son of Beor at Pethor, which is near the River in the land of the sons of his people, to call him, saying: "Look, a people has come from Egypt. See, they cover the face of the earth, and are settling next to me! 6 Therefore please come at once, curse this people for me, for they are too mighty for me. Perhaps I shall be able to defeat them and drive them out of the land, for I know that he whom you bless is blessed, and he whom you curse is cursed." The next three chapters deal with the prophet Balaam, who was sent by Balak, another king of Moab, to curse Israel. Balak had seen how the people of Israel had defeated the armies of southern Moab, as well as Sihon king of the Amorites and Og of Bashan, and decided war with the people of Israel was not his best course of action. And we will see how even the hiring of Balaam did not work out for him the way he intended.

First, let’s clear up one geographical question. Some translations, even some of the better ones, translate verse one in a manner similar to this: Then the people of Israel set out and camped in the plains of Moab beyond the Jordan at Jericho (ESV). This could give the impression that the people crossed the Jordan River and were encamped at Jericho, which was in the land of Canaan. This could thus lead to the question, “If God told Moses he would not enter the Promised Land, then why did he wind up in Jericho, which is in Canaan?” That would be a good question. This is a matter of translation, and there are some translations that render it better than others. The NASB renders Numbers 22:1—Then the sons of Israel journeyed, and camped in the plains of Moab beyond the Jordan opposite Jericho. The Bishop’s Bible says And the children of Israel departed and pitched in the fieldes of Moab, on the other side of Iordane from Iericho. The God’s Word Bible renders it Then the Israelites moved and set up camp across from Jericho, on the plains of Moab east of the Jordan River. Suffice to say, the people of Israel were still on the east side of the Jordan River, in the northern part of the land of Moab. Kinda like Point Roberts, WA. It is part of the state of Washington, and within the borders of the United States. But it is separated from the rest of the state by the Strait of Georgia, and there is no ferry service across the strait. So to get from Point Roberts to Seattle, you must first cross into Canada, then back into the United States. 

 The Expositor’s Bible describes the land:

While a part of the army of Israel was engaged in the campaign against Bashan, the tribes remained "in the plains of Moab beyond the Jordan at Jericho." The topography is given here, as elsewhere, from the point of view of one dwelling in Canaan; and the locality indicated is a level stretch of land, some five or six miles broad, between the river and the hills. In this plain there was ample room for the encampment, while along the Jordan and on the slopes to the east all the produce of field and garden, the spoil of conquest, was at the disposal of the Israelites. They rested therefore, after their long journey, in sight of Canaan, waiting first for the return of the troops, then for the command to advance; and the delay may very likely have extended to several months.

And since they were stationed along the banks of the Jordan River, guess what else they had? WATER! They wouldn’t have to complain about having water, for it was there for the drinking, running, living water! 

2 Now Balak the son of Zippor saw all that Israel had done to the Amorites. 3 And Moab was exceedingly afraid of the people because they were many, and Moab was sick with dread because of the children of Israel. Just as I said last time about the people of Jericho learning of how mighty was the God who fought for Israel, so first Balak and the people of the Moabite plains were sore afraid of Him. So rather than use a military strategy against them, Balak devised a stratagem based on their following God. He would hire a prophet to curse them and stave off an invasion by Israel. They did, indeed, fear God. There was a fear of God before their eyes. And if they had approached Moses and submitted themselves to YHVH, and kept His commandments, they would have had peace. But how often do those who do not want to submit to God find ways to oppose Him and store up wrath for themselves?

Numbers 22:7-14—7 So the elders of Moab and the elders of Midian departed with the diviner's fee in their hand, and they came to Balaam and spoke to him the words of Balak. 8 And he said to them, "Lodge here tonight, and I will bring back word to you, as the LORD speaks to me." So the princes of Moab stayed with Balaam. 9 Then God came to Balaam and said, "Who are these men with you?" 10 So Balaam said to God, "Balak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, has sent to me, saying, 11 'Look, a people has come out of Egypt, and they cover the face of the earth. Come now, curse them for me; perhaps I shall be able to overpower them and drive them out.'" 12 And God said to Balaam, "You shall not go with them; you shall not curse the people, for they are blessed." 13 So Balaam rose in the morning and said to the princes of Balak, "Go back to your land, for the LORD has refused to give me permission to go with you." 14 And the princes of Moab rose and went to Balak, and said, "Balaam refuses to come with us." Moab entered league with Midian, a tribe which was located to the southwest of the Dead Sea. The thought, I suppose, was to box Israel in between the two nations and, once (so they thought) the Israelites were cursed, it would be no great things to defeat them. About that whole “cursing Israel” thing…

Balaam was indeed a prophet, even a prophet who was recognized by God. And here we see that Balaam, although a Moabite and hired by the Moabite king to curse Israel, does not initially go against the word of God. The princes of Balak offer him a large sum of money to call down a curse upon Israel. But what is his response, after talking with God? And notice, there is no hint of insolence in Balaam’s words when he is talking with God. He tells the princes "Go back to your land, for the LORD has refused to give me permission to go with you." For any rational human being, this should have been the end of things. But calling Balak rational would not be a correct assessment of his mental state. Had the people of Israel made any kind of threatening movement towards him? No. They were simply hanging out by the Jordan River, waiting to cross it into Canaan. But Balak didn’t care, he wanted them gone. But he was afraid to engage them in combat after they had destroyed Sihon and Og. So now, since Balaam has returned and told him that he could not curse Israel, he starts to panic a bit.

Numbers 22:15-19—15 Then Balak again sent princes, more numerous and more honorable than they. 16 And they came to Balaam and said to him, "Thus says Balak the son of Zippor: 'Please let nothing hinder you from coming to me; 17 for I will certainly honor you greatly, and I will do whatever you say to me. Therefore please come, curse this people for me.'" 18 Then Balaam answered and said to the servants of Balak, "Though Balak were to give me his house full of silver and gold, I could not go beyond the word of the LORD my God, to do less or more. 19 Now therefore, please, you also stay here tonight, that I may know what more the LORD will say to me." So after he has told Balak that he cannot curse Israel because God prevented him from doing so, Balak doubles down and sends even more princes and more money to him, in an effort to persuade Balaam to transgress against what God has said. But again, Balaam stands his ground and says even if Balak offered all of his wealth, he cannot go against God. So he tells the princes to stay the night with him again while he goes and talks to God. And I suppose Balaam could have sent away the princes and been done with the whole matter, but we see how he equivocates and even (perhaps) hopes that God will give him a different word. As if he was perhaps double-minded.  James 1:8 (KJV)—A double minded man is unstable in all his ways. And Balaam will find that out next.

Numbers 22:20-22—20 And God came to Balaam at night and said to him, "If the men come to call you, rise and go with them; but only the word which I speak to you—that you shall do." 21 So Balaam rose in the morning, saddled his donkey, and went with the princes of Moab. 22 Then God's anger was aroused because he went, and the Angel of the LORD took His stand in the way as an adversary against him. And he was riding on his donkey, and his two servants were with him. Now this is a confusing passage. In verse 19 God says to Balaam to go with the princes, then in verse 20 He is angry because he went with the princes. So something must have happened between God telling him to go with the princes and him actually going with the princes. The best hypotheses I have seen say that in this meantime Balaam took the money from the princes and this was the reason for God’s anger. Which would make sense of 3 New Testament verses which paint Balaam in a less-than-favorable light. 2nd Peter 2:15—They have forsaken the right way and gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Beor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness.  Jude 1:11—Woe to them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah. Revelation 2:14—“But I have a few things against you [the church at Pergamos], because you have there those who hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual immorality.” FB Meyer wrote that:

If only Balaam had abided by his first answer to Balak’s request, he would have been saved from the disgrace and suffering which ensued. But he seemed to think that it was possible to alter God’s mind; hence his request to the second company of messengers that they give him time to ascertain God’s will. Already that will had been clearly made known to him; what object had he in pressing for a further response? When, finally, he was told that he might go, he rose up in the morning, saddled his ass, and started post-haste. He was trying to serve two masters-to speak as God bade him, but to please Balak and pocket his gold. How many agencies God uses to arrest our evil courses! Peter specially refers to this incident. Many cries are raised to stop the boat that is caught in the rapids above Niagara! Thus the way of transgressors is made hard by the love of God!

CI Scofield:

In Numbers 22:12 the directive will of Jehovah is made known to Balaam, in Numbers 22:20 Jehovah’s permissive will. The prophet is now free to go, but knows the true mind of the Lord about it. The matter is wholly one between Jehovah and His servant. The permission of Numbers 22:20 really constitutes a testing of Balaam. He chose the path of self-will and self- advantage, and Jehovah could not but gravely disapprove. The whole scene, Numbers 22:22-35 prepared Balaam for what was to follow.

So yes, God allowed him to go, but did not want him to go. He already had his answer once, but allowed himself to be played along with wealth. How many times does God need to say something for it to be true? But he stepped further away from the commands that God had given him. It is no different for many people today, who creep away from the fences God has put up to keep us away from sin. Hebrews 1:13-2:1—1 But to which of the angels has He ever said: "Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool"? 14 Are they not all ministering spirits sent forth to minister for those who will inherit salvation?  2:1 Therefore we must give the more earnest heed to the things we have heard, lest we drift away. Let us always hold fast the words given to us, lest we slide away, by little and little, away from the goodness of God.

Numbers 22:23-33—23 Now the donkey saw the Angel of the LORD standing in the way with His drawn sword in His hand, and the donkey turned aside out of the way and went into the field. So Balaam struck the donkey to turn her back onto the road. 24 Then the Angel of the LORD stood in a narrow path between the vineyards, with a wall on this side and a wall on that side. 25 And when the donkey saw the Angel of the LORD, she pushed herself against the wall and crushed Balaam's foot against the wall; so he struck her again. 26 Then the Angel of the LORD went further, and stood in a narrow place where there was no way to turn either to the right hand or to the left. 27 And when the donkey saw the Angel of the LORD, she lay down under Balaam; so Balaam's anger was aroused, and he struck the donkey with his staff. 28 Then the LORD opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said to Balaam, "What have I done to you, that you have struck me these three times?" 29 And Balaam said to the donkey, "Because you have abused me. I wish there were a sword in my hand, for now I would kill you!" 30 So the donkey said to Balaam, "Am I not your donkey on which you have ridden, ever since I became yours, to this day? Was I ever disposed to do this to you?" And he said, "No." 31 Then the LORD opened Balaam's eyes, and he saw the Angel of the LORD standing in the way with His drawn sword in His hand; and he bowed his head and fell flat on his face. 32 And the Angel of the LORD said to him, "Why have you struck your donkey these three times? Behold, I have come out to stand against you, because your way is perverse before Me. 33 The donkey saw Me and turned aside from Me these three times. If she had not turned aside from Me, surely I would also have killed you by now, and let her live." 

Do you not find it odd that Balaam answered his donkey when it spoke to him as if it were a natural thing? Think about it. You’re riding along the path on your donkey, it bucks against you, so you strike it. Then the third time you strike it, the donkey turns around and begins talking to you. And you answer! This is one of those places where the skeptic discards the Bible. “A talking donkey! And in Genesis a talking snake?? Nope, not gonna believe this! Next thing you’re gonna tell me an angel slew 200,000 soldiers in one night!” That is because they do not want to believe in a God that can do things in His Creation that we as humans do not understand.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is probably the most famous scientist of our day. And although he does not classify himself as an atheist (he calls himself an agnostic) and consistently argues against the existence of God. He has said in the past, “‘God’ is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller and smaller as time moves on.’” But did the scientists like Michael Faraday and Johannes Kepler not believe in God simply because they were scientists? No. Kepler wrote, “The chief aim of all investigations of the external world should be to discover the rational order and harmony which has been imposed on it by God and which He revealed to us in the language of mathematics.” These were men upon whose shoulders Neil deGrasse Tyson purports to stand. But he says of them, “They [scientists of centuries past] call on God only from the lonely and precarious edge of incomprehension. Where they feel certain about their explanations, however, God gets hardly a mention.” Almost mocking them for their faith. But that’s what he does. But these men knew the truth and sounded forth the truth of Psalm 19:1—The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork. But alas, The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God" (Psalm 14:1). And here is Balaam arguing with his donkey, knowing that it was God who was speaking through his donkey. And let us remember the words of our Lord. Luke 19:39-40—39 And some of the Pharisees called to Him from the crowd, "Teacher, rebuke Your disciples." 40 But He answered and said to them, "I tell you that if these should keep silent, the stones would immediately cry out." And you could say the donkey was smarter than Balaam in this instance. The donkey saw the Angel of the Lord, and bowed himself to it. Well did Isaiah say in Isaiah 1:3—“The ox knows its owner and the donkey its master's crib; but Israel does not know, My people do not consider.”

But we could probably cut Balaam some slack as he did not see the Angel in the road. Then the LORD opened Balaam's eyes, and he saw the Angel of the LORD standing in the way with His drawn sword in His hand; and he bowed his head and fell flat on his face. How many times do we see in the Scriptures that God opens people’s eyes to see what is right in front of them. When Jesus is sitting with the two travelers on the road to Emmaus, and He is talking with them, and they do not know that it is Him, we see in Luke 24:30-31—30 Now it came to pass, as He sat at the table with them, that He took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. 31 Then their eyes were opened and they knew Him; and He vanished from their sight. God hid Balaam’s eyes from seeing the Angel until the appropriate time. And when his eyes were opened he realized the wrong he had done. Numbers 22:34-35—34 And Balaam said to the Angel of the LORD, "I have sinned, for I did not know You stood in the way against me. Now therefore, if it displeases You, I will turn back." 35 Then the Angel of the LORD said to Balaam, "Go with the men, but only the word that I speak to you, that you shall speak." So Balaam went with the princes of Balak. God repeats what He told Balaam when Balaam went with the princes of Moab. Only this time, Balaam knew better. Kinda like when God called Jonah to go preach to Nineveh, and instead the prophet got on a boat headed to Spain. God sent a great fish that swallowed him up, took him back to where he started from and spit him out onto the dry land. And what did God say to Jonah once the fish spit him out? Jonah 3:2—"Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and preach to it the message that I tell you."

Part 2 next week

Jesus Christ is Lord.

Amen.

A Survey of the Old Testament Law--Numbers 21 (Part 2)

Numbers 21:21-26—21 Then Israel sent messengers to Sihon king of the Amorites, saying, 22 "Let me pass through your land. We will not turn aside into fields or vineyards; we will not drink water from wells. We will go by the King's Highway until we have passed through your territory." 23 But Sihon would not allow Israel to pass through his territory. So Sihon gathered all his people together and went out against Israel in the wilderness, and he came to Jahaz and fought against Israel. 24 Then Israel defeated him with the edge of the sword, and took possession of his land from the Arnon to the Jabbok, as far as the people of Ammon; for the border of the people of Ammon was fortified. 25 So Israel took all these cities, and Israel dwelt in all the cities of the Amorites, in Heshbon and in all its villages. 26 For Heshbon was the city of Sihon king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and had taken all his land from his hand as far as the Arnon. So the people are on the border of Moab and the Amorites. They need to continue northward to the land to which God has called them. To do so they must pass through the land of the Amorites. Now to take a little side trip, the term “Amorites” is a bit tricky, as there is not a land named “Amor” as there is Moab or Edom. If you look back at verse 13, it mentions that the Arnon River is the border between Moab and the Amorites. This is because the Amorites were an amalgamation of people of the Babylonian empire. If you look to find a region called “Amor” or anything similar, you will not find it. According to the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia:

 

Assyriological discovery has explained the varying use of the name. The Hebrew form of it is a transliteration of the Babylonian Amurrū, which was both singular and plural. In the age of Abraham the Amurru were the dominant people in western Asia; hence Syria and Palestine were called by the Babylonians “the land of the Amorites”… The use of the name “Amorite” in its general sense belongs to the Babylonian period of oriental history.

 

(https://timeintheword.org/2017/03/09/warning-moab-and-ammon/)

At any rate, the people of Israel need to pass through this land to get to their ultimate destination. But there is a problem. Sihon would not allow Israel to pass through his territory. Once again the people are rebuffed from passing peacefully through a particular piece of land (see Numbers 20:20-21). But this time things are different. Whereas when Edom refused them passage and the people simply went around that land, here a battle is engaged. So Sihon gathered all his people together and went out against Israel in the wilderness, and he came to Jahaz and fought against Israel. Why would Sihon do this? In part to (at least partly) fulfill what God said in Genesis 15:13-16—13 Then He said to Abram: "Know certainly that your descendants will be strangers in a land that is not theirs, and will serve them, and they will afflict them four hundred years. 14 And also the nation whom they serve I will judge; afterward they shall come out with great possessions. 15 Now as for you, you shall go to your fathers in peace; you shall be buried at a good old age. 16 But in the fourth generation they shall return here, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete." Here we see God give a prophecy to Abram that his descendants would dwell in Egypt as sojourners, would serve them for 400 years, that God would judge Egypt, and in the fourth generation after they leave Egypt they would return to the land of the Amorites. And this delay would be because the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete. Which answers the inevitable question, “Why would God lead them to lands where they would have to fight?” Why would He do that? So that the iniquity of the Amorites would be completed. Why would God command Jeremiah to prophesy, knowing he would be cast into a deep well? Why would God lead Paul to Lystra and Derbe, where he would be stoned with stones to within an inch of his life? Why would He lead the remaining Apostles to lands where He knew they would be martyred? Why would He lead Jim Elliott to the Waodoni people, knowing he would die before he would ever meet them? 

First, so His gospel could be proclaimed. Second, to fill up the iniquity of those who oppose Him. Matthew 23:31-32—31 “Therefore you are witnesses against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. 32 Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers' guilt.” The Pharisees had many more sins to commit before they had finished filling the cup that their father began with. There is, for each one who is opposed to God, a measure of guilt they must fulfill. And this measure must be filled. And God will leave these people on the earth until this measure is filled. “But that’s not fair! That’s not the God I worship! The God I believe in wants everyone to be saved, and would never want anyone to sin!” Well, that may be the god you worship, but that is not the God of Scripture. God says many times, from Genesis to Revelation, that there are measures of sin that must be fulfilled. Revelation 14:18-19—18 And another angel came out from the altar, who had power over fire, and he cried with a loud cry to him who had the sharp sickle, saying, "Thrust in your sharp sickle and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth, for her grapes are fully ripe." 19 So the angel thrust his sickle into the earth and gathered the vine of the earth, and threw it into the great winepress of the wrath of God. What does the angel mean when he says “the grapes are fully ripe” but that the sinners have filled their cup with sin to the measure which God has decreed, and the time has come for them to be gathered and cast into the winepress of God to receive their eternal due? 

And here we see the onset of the kings of the Amorites completing the measure of their sin. First by Sihon, then by Og od Bashan. Numbers 21:33-35—33 And they turned and went up by the way to Bashan. So Og king of Bashan went out against them, he and all his people, to battle at Edrei. 34 Then the LORD said to Moses, "Do not fear him, for I have delivered him into your hand, with all his people and his land; and you shall do to him as you did to Sihon king of the Amorites, who dwelt at Heshbon." 35 So they defeated him, his sons, and all his people, until there was no survivor left him; and they took possession of his land. I'm skipping ahead a few verses, but we will come back to those verses in just a bit. In the Old Testament we see Sihon and Og mentioned together in the same verse 9 times. These were the two kings of the Amorites who tried to destroy the people of Israel when all they wanted was to pass through the land. And it was because of the defiance of Og that the iniquity of the Amorites was completed, their cities destroyed, and all their people killed. As Matthew Henry wrote in his Concise Commentary, Those not awakened by the judgments of God on others, ripen for the like judgments on themselves. Og had not learned from the defeat of Sihon; he thought himself and his soldiers better than these pesky slaves. And he learned the hard way—as did all the people “What do you mean ‘all the people’? Do you mean women and children as well?” Yes, women and children as well. For they were not spared when God commanded the people of Israel to destroy a people. Deuteronomy 3:3, 6—3 “So the LORD our God also delivered into our hands Og king of Bashan, with all his people, and we attacked him until he had no survivors remaining…6 And we utterly destroyed them, as we did to Sihon king of Heshbon, utterly destroying the men, women, and children of every city.” Was this destruction any worse than the eternal fate that awaited them? These were women of peoples that were opposed to God and worshipped idols. The children, had they grown to adulthood, would have also worshipped those same idols. “How do you know that God wouldn’t deliver them the way He did Rahab or Ruth?” Well, He didn’t. Which speaks to the election by God. He saved some from their heathen people and the damnation they would have experienced. But others He didn’t. Why? His election and purpose. 

Even the people of Jericho were not as brazen as Og. Did the people of Jericho go out to battle the people of Israel as they marched around the city? They indeed tried to capture the two spies, but as the people were led by the Levites around the city, did their men go out with swords against them?  Joshua 2:9-10—9 and [Rahab] said to the men: “I know that the LORD has given you the land, that the terror of you has fallen on us, and that all the inhabitants of the land are fainthearted because of you. 10 For we have heard how the LORD dried up the water of the Red Sea for you when you came out of Egypt, and what you did to the two kings of the Amorites who were on the other side of the Jordan, Sihon and Og, whom you utterly destroyed. No, the people of the city were terrified of them. Then Joshua fit the Battle of Jericho, and the walls came a-tumblin’ down! 

One last thing about this passage. Then Israel…took possession of his land from the Arnon to the Jabbok, as far as the people of Ammon. The Ammonites and the Moabites were descendants of Lot. After God rescued them from the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the daughters of Lot were under the assumption that they and their father were the last people on Earth, and it was up to them to repopulate the planet. So they got their father drunk and took advantage of him. Genesis 19:36-38—36 Thus both the daughters of Lot were with child by their father. 37 The firstborn bore a son and called his name Moab; he is the father of the Moabites to this day. 38 And the younger, she also bore a son and called his name Ben-Ammi; he is the father of the people of Ammon to this day. God had delivered Lot from the sinful city, only to see his wife look back fondly and turn into a pillar of salt, and for his daughters to conceive children by him who would grow into two nations that were enemies of the people of God. Both of these tribes settled in the area we now call Jordan. Both of these peoples were assimilated into the Roman population by the time of Christ’s arrival. The city of Amman, that capital of Jordan, derives its name from them, as they lived mostly in the northern part of modern-day Jordan. 

And the Moabites? Well, one of them is an ancestor of Jesus. Ruth 1:3-4—3 Then Elimelech, Naomi's husband, died; and she was left, and her two sons. 4 Now they took wives of the women of Moab: the name of the one was Orpah, and the name of the other Ruth. Matthew 1:5-6—5 Boaz begot Obed by Ruth, Obed begot Jesse, 6 and Jesse begot David the king. Ruth, the Moabitess, was the grandmother of King David. “But how could this be, when it says in Deuteronomy 23:3—‘An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter the assembly of the LORD; even to the tenth generation none of his descendants shall enter the assembly of the LORD forever.’?” This is one of those places where you have to put it in context and look at how it was written in its original language. In the Hebrew, the words “Moabite” and “Ammonite” are in the masculine form. In other words, Israelitish women were prohibited from marrying Moabitish or Ammonitish men, but Israelitish men could marry Moabitish or Ammonitish women. This was to meant to keep the Israelitish stock pure, since children were considered to be descended from the father, and to have the father be of a heathen nation would be an abomination to God. John Gill:

 

 An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord…Or marry an Israelitish woman, as Jarchi, and so the Targum of Jonathan, "the male Ammonites and Moabites are not fit to take a wife of the congregation of the Lord;'' for the Jews restrain this to men, because it is, as Aben Ezra observes, an Ammonite, not an Ammonitess, a Moabite, not a Moabitess; they allow that females of those nations might be married to Israelites, that is, provided they were proselytesses, as Ruth was.

Numbers 21:26-32—26 For Heshbon was the city of Sihon king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and had taken all his land from his hand as far as the Arnon. 27 Therefore those who speak in proverbs say: "Come to Heshbon, let it be built; let the city of Sihon be repaired. 28 For fire went out from Heshbon, a flame from the city of Sihon; it consumed Ar of Moab, the lords of the heights of the Arnon. 29 Woe to you, Moab! You have perished, O people of Chemosh! He has given his sons as fugitives, and his daughters into captivity, to Sihon king of the Amorites. 30 But we have shot at them; Heshbon has perished as far as Dibon. Then we laid waste as far as Nophah, which reaches to Medeba." 31 Thus Israel dwelt in the land of the Amorites. 32 Then Moses sent to spy out Jazer; and they took its villages and drove out the Amorites who were there. Verses 27-30 is a song sung by the people of Israel after they defeated Sihon. It is a song of almost mockery, as the song went up that Chemosh, the god of the Moab could do nothing to protect the Moabites from the people that YHVH fought for. This is a common theme throughout the Old Testament, that the gods of the pagans are helpless against the one, true, Living God. Because they are mute idols, unable to stand before the one true God.

 

(https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2685112991572544&set=pcb.2685123044904872)

When the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant, they set it next to their idol Dagon, thinking they would just add one more god to their collection. But, alas! 1st Samuel 5:2-4—2 When the Philistines took the ark of God, they brought it into the house of Dagon and set it by Dagon. 3 And when the people of Ashdod arose early in the morning, there was Dagon, fallen on its face to the earth before the ark of the LORD. So they took Dagon and set it in its place again. 4 And when they arose early the next morning, there was Dagon, fallen on its face to the ground before the ark of the LORD. The head of Dagon and both the palms of its hands were broken off on the threshold; only Dagon's torso was left of it. 

The ten plagues that were visited upon Egypt under Pharaoh were God’s way of saying their gods were useless. And let us not forget the challenge of Elijah against the prophets of Ba'al atop Mount Carmel. They cut up their sacrifice, they gouged themselves, they danced and cried all day for a god who would not answer. I like the way the ESV renders 1st Kings 18:26-29—26 And they took the bull that was given them, and they prepared it and called upon the name of Baal from morning until noon, saying, "O Baal, answer us!" But there was no voice, and no one answered. And they limped around the altar that they had made. 27 And at noon Elijah mocked them, saying, "Cry aloud, for he is a god. Either he is musing, or he is relieving himself, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened." 28 And they cried aloud and cut themselves after their custom with swords and lances, until the blood gushed out upon them. 29 And as midday passed, they raved on until the time of the offering of the oblation, but there was no voice. No one answered; no one paid attention. Did Elijah feel pity for them? Did he sympathize with them? Did he offer them any relief? No. And for good reason. Paul would write that we should avoid those who bring a different message than belief in YHVH. Galatians 1:8—But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge says this about calling on gods who cannot hear and who cannot answer:

 

Such were the absurd and degrading notions which the heathens entertained of their gods. "Vishnoo sleeps four months in the year; and to each of the gods some particular business is assigned. Vayoo manages the winds; Vuroonu the waters, etc. According to a number of fables in the Pooranus, the gods are often out on journeys or expeditions." Ward's Views of the Hindoos, vol. ii. p. 324.

Jeremiah the prophet warns the people about making for themselves idols of wood that are powerless to do anything to affect their lives. Jeremiah 10:3-6—3 For the customs of the peoples are futile; for one cuts a tree from the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the ax. 4 They decorate it with silver and gold; they fasten it with nails and hammers so that it will not topple. 5 They are upright, like a palm tree, and they cannot speak; they must be carried, because they cannot go by themselves. Do not be afraid of them, for they cannot do evil, nor can they do any good, 6 Inasmuch as there is none like You, O LORD (You are great, and Your name is great in might).” And no, he wasn’t talking about Christmas trees! 

Even today we have some who set up dumb idols and ascribe to them the attributes of Almighty God. Look in any Roman Catholic “church” and you will find there idolatry. Statues of Mary with candles and incense before them. Names of dead saints upon the doorposts. Prayers being said to those who cannot hear them and can effect no change in the person’s circumstances. Strings of beads to remind the people of what they are supposed to ask of the one who is indeed worthy of our gratitude but can in no wise do anything for the people who chant her name in vain. This idolatry is found not only here in the United States, but in Mexico, in South America, in Italy and many other countries where they cut down a tree, decorate it with silver and gold, and fasten nails and hammer it so it does not topple. They worship bones and pieces of wood. John Calvin, in his “Treatise on Relics”, famously said “In some places there are large fragments of Christ’s cross, as at the Holy Chapel in Paris, at Poitiers, and at Rome, where a good-sized crucifix is said to have been made of it. In brief, if all the pieces that could be found were collected together, they would make a big ship-load.” And they “venerate”—believe it or not—what they believe to be Jesus’ foreskin. And so many are swept up into this idolatry because it has marks and appearances of holiness. But Paul warned Timothy of this. In 2nd Timothy 3:5 he warns us that there will be those who will have the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. And the robes and the vestments and the stained glass all look so holy and religious. But do they address prayers to God? Do they ask Him for forgiveness for their sins? Do they call upon Him to deliver them from evil? Is their Rosary to guide them to God through Jesus Christ our Lord? No. They are no different than the people of Moab who called upon Chemosh to ask him for victory over the Israelites. 

Lord God, Almighty Creator of Heaven and Earth. Please guide our hearts to worship You and You alone. Let us not put our trust in those who cannot hear our prayers, but let our prayers rise to You, that You may hear our petitions and supplications, You being the only One who can hear them. Let us look unto Christ, the Author and Finisher of faith, not depending on our own merit or our own works, which we do not do in order to be saved, but because we are saved. May we always look to You to be our Guide and our Help in the difficult times, and our Joy and Peace in the good times.

 

 Jesus Christ is Lord.

Amen.