Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts

07 May 2025

A Surrvey of the Old Testament Law--Numbers 5 (Part 4)

Numbers 5:11-3111 And the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, 12 "Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them: 'If any man's wife goes astray and behaves unfaithfully toward him, 13 and a man lies with her carnally, and it is hidden from the eyes of her husband, and it is concealed that she has defiled herself, and there was no witness against her, nor was she caught—14 if the spirit of jealousy comes upon him and he becomes jealous of his wife, who has defiled herself; or if the spirit of jealousy comes upon him and he becomes jealous of his wife, although she has not defiled herself—15 then the man shall bring his wife to the priest. He shall bring the offering required for her, one-tenth of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil on it and put no frankincense on it, because it is a grain offering of jealousy, an offering for remembering, for bringing iniquity to remembrance. 16 And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the LORD. 17 The priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel, and take some of the dust that is on the floor of the tabernacle and put it into the water. 18 Then the priest shall stand the woman before the LORD, uncover the woman's head, and put the offering for remembering in her hands, which is the grain offering of jealousy. And the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 And the priest shall put her under oath, and say to the woman, "If no man has lain with you, and if you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a curse. 20 But if you have gone astray while under your husband's authority, and if you have defiled yourself and some man other than your husband has lain with you"—21 then the priest shall put the woman under the oath of the curse, and he shall say to the woman—"the LORD make you a curse and an oath among your people, when the LORD makes your thigh rot and your belly swell; 22 and may this water that causes the curse go into your stomach, and make your belly swell and your thigh rot." Then the woman shall say, "Amen, so be it." 23 Then the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall scrape them off into the bitter water. 24 And he shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and the water that brings the curse shall enter her to become bitter. 25 Then the priest shall take the grain offering of jealousy from the woman's hand, shall wave the offering before the LORD, and bring it to the altar; 26 and the priest shall take a handful of the offering, as its memorial portion, burn it on the altar, and afterward make the woman drink the water. 27 When he has made her drink the water, then it shall be, if she has defiled herself and behaved unfaithfully toward her husband, that the water that brings a curse will enter her and become bitter, and her belly will swell, her thigh will rot, and the woman will become a curse among her people. 28 But if the woman has not defiled herself, and is clean, then she shall be free and may conceive children. 29 'This is the law of jealousy, when a wife, while under her husband's authority, goes astray and defiles herself, 30 or when the spirit of jealousy comes upon a man, and he becomes jealous of his wife; then he shall stand the woman before the LORD, and the priest shall execute all this law upon her. 31 Then the man shall be free from iniquity, but that woman shall bear her guilt.'" The pro-abortion crowd loves to bring up this passage, as if it is some kind of “Gotcha” for the pro-lifers. There is just one problem with that. Well, more than one, but we will examine all the problems.

First of all, they only read from the NIV, the only major translation that relates any kind of miscarriage in this passage. Numbers 5:22 (NIV)[the priest shall say] ‘“May this water that brings curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries”. Then the woman is to say “Amen. So be it”’. No other major translation uses the word “miscarry”. Why? Because it is not in the Hebrew text. Why?  Read the entire passage again, and tell me where a pregnancy is mentioned. I’ll wait. Okay, time’s up. Not in there, is it?

And second, if she is pregnant, doesn’t that kinda blow the whole “concealed” thing out of the water? Because when a woman is pregnant, what happens to her belly? But here we see if she has been unfaithful, this test will make her belly swell. And she will become barren, and a curse among the people. There is a Hebrew word that translates as “miscarry”, and that is שָׁכֹל (shâkôl), and it means, literally, “to miscarry”. But that Hebrew word is nowhere to be found in this passage. So, why the 2011 NIV uses the word “miscarry” here is a mystery. Just one reason I don’t particularly care for the NIV. And really, when one of the abortion advocates latch onto this passage as an approval from God for abortion, they really show how clueless they are about the Scriptures. Because in Numbers 5:28 it says But if the woman has not defiled herself, and is clean, then she shall be free and may conceive children. So it is clear, from the surrounding verses, that the punishment is not a miscarriage, but barrenness.

So many on the side of abortion get so angry when you say you’re opposed to it. Even if you are not argumentative, they will lash out at you for all they’re worth. And they will defend Planned Parenthood almost to the utmost.  Even though Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, an outspoken eugenicist and friend of the KKK. Planned Parenthood, in 1964, admitted that abortion ended a life. In an ad for birth control ad in 1964, Planned Parenthood themselves said the following:

An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health. It may make you sterile so that when you want a child you cannot have it.

It kills the life of a baby. But they have changed their tune over the years and now they will tell you today that it is not a baby, that it is merely a clump of cells. It is no different than having a tooth pulled. Why have they changed their tune? I can tell you in one word, and that word rhymes with “Money”. They want to make more of it, and they will have less of a chance to do it if you know that you are killing a baby. Interestingly, at the Democratic Party Convention in 1964, a document entitled “The Population Crisis:  A Program for Action.  Statement to the Committee on Resolutions and Platforms of the 1964 Democratic Convention” stated:

In  the  United  States,  population  growth underlies and  contributes  to  the  three  major  domestic  ills  which the Johnson Administration and the Democratic Party have pledged to eradicate – poverty, discrimination and unemployment.

In other words, they believed we need to kill more babies in order to obtain a state of Utopia. Have they really changed their beliefs over the years? No. But their tactics have. Remember when I said that Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, was an enthusiastic eugenicist? It’s true, she hated blacks.

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

And the quote that still resonates today, and is the reason many liberals want abortion on demand is this:

“[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children…”

Abortion is a practice this country has exported around the world, promising women they can live a happy life if they just kill their child while it is growing in the womb. Their mantra is “Keep abortion safe, legal and rare” or “My Body, My Choice” (of course, if they were to be truthful, they would say “Your Body, My Choice”). Of course it’s never safe, and where it is legal, they don’t want it to be rare. If a pregnant woman says they want to keep her baby, depending on the circumstances, she will be verbally assaulted with the most hateful speech you could imagine. Of course, our mantra, we on the Pro-Life side, is “Abortion: One Dead, One Wounded”. It is the only “medical” procedure that is successful if a death occurs.

When he has made her drink the water, then it shall be, if she has defiled herself and behaved unfaithfully toward her husband, that the water that brings a curse will enter her and become bitter, and her belly will swell, her thigh will rot, and the woman will become a curse among her people. Just one more thing before I wind up this passage. First, this would be an example of what the writer says in Hebrews 6:16For men indeed swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of all dispute. These days, when a person is on the witness stand during a trial, they place their hand on a Bible and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. And if it is found out they lie, they are charged with perjury. And maybe they get convicted and sentenced, or maybe they don’t. That was not the case here. The husband and wife go to the priest, he makes some bitter water, he puts her under oath to God Himself. Now, at this point, if she has gone astray, she should say so. Because if she has been unfaithful, and she lies about it, her unfaithfulness will become obvious and not only will she bring upon herself a curse, she will actually become a curse. She has sworn to Almighty God that she is not guilty, and if she is, God will not let her escape. So before she drinks the water, she should examine herself if she has done what she is accused of doing.

We should do the same thing when we partake of the Lord’s Table. We should examine ourselves to see if there is any sin in our lives and get rid of it before we take the brad and the wine. 1st Corinthians 11:28But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. Because when we take the bread and the wine we are not simply eating, we are proclaiming Christ, and we are saying that we belong to Christ. And if we do partake of the bread and the wine when we have sin in our lives, we run the grave risk that many suffered in Corinth. 1st Corinthians 11:29-3029 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30 For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep. Does this mean we have to be perfectly sinless when we come? No, of course not, for who can be sinless except Christ Himself? But we must look at our lives, and decide if there is some persistent sin that we must get rid of , or even if we think we have no sin, which thinking actually is sin (see 1st John 1:10). This not only makes God a liar but is also a product of pride, something that should not dwell in us who know Christ. We should be the humblest of all creatures, knowing that we are saved from an eternity on Hell because God has shown us His grace and has extended His mercy to us, in sending His Son to pay the penalty we should have paid ourselves. So let us examine ourselves as the unfaithful wife should have examined herself before she drank the bitter water. I will end with the words from John Calvin on 1st Corinthians 11:28:

You see here a method that is most easily apprehended. If you would wish to use aright the benefit afforded by Christ, bring faith and repentance. As to these two things, therefore, the trial must be made, if you would come duly prepared. Under repentance I include love; for the man who has learned to renounce himself, that he may give himself up wholly to Christ and his service, will also, without doubt, carefully maintain that unity which Christ has enjoined. At the same time, it is not a perfect faith or repentance that is required, as some, by urging beyond due bounds, a perfection that can nowhere be found, would shut out for ever from the Supper every individual of mankind. If, however, thou aspirest after the righteousness of God with the earnest desire of thy mind, and, trembled under a view of thy misery, dost wholly lean upon Christ’s grace, and rest upon it, know that thou art a worthy guest to approach the table—worthy I mean in this respect, that the Lord does not exclude thee, though in another point of view there is something in thee that is not as it ought to be. For faith, when it is but begun, makes those worthy who were unworthy.

 

Jesus Christ is Lord.

Amen.

30 December 2009

"It's not really a person"



The following is a very disturbing story out of Virginia. A story that shows just how depraved the human heart truly is. And, how some politicians don't care, just so long as they get re-elected. And, if this story gets enough national attention, it may just give us a glimpse into the mindset of many. From HotAir via Ingrid Schlueter at CrossTalk:
This may be the worst story of the year, at least in reference to domestic policy and crime. How bad is it? When Matt of Creative Minority Report tipped me to it this morning, I had to track it down to make sure it was on the level. A woman in Campbell County, Virginia smothered her newborn infant, and police are powerless to do anything about it:


That's right. Even though this child had fully exited the womb. Even though this child was fully capable of living on its own. Even though this child, by all rights, should have been protected like any other human being. The fact that the umbilical cord was still attached and the placenta had not been expelled means, in the minds of some sick, twisted, perverted minds, that this was not, in fact, a human being. And so this woman gets away with murdering her child because of a loophole in Virginia law. And this was not the first time something like this had happened there:
The Campbell County Sheriff’s Office and Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office worked unsuccessfully to get the law changed after another baby died in the county in a similar case. Emerson says they asked two delegates and one state senator to take the issue up in the General Assembly.

And since this was not the first time, the state legislators and other law-making bodies in the state would have been more than quick to close that loophole......or not:
Emerson says they asked two delegates and one state senator to take the issue up in the General Assembly. He says the three lawmakers refused because they felt the issue was too close to the abortion issue.

The reason this loophole is still in place can be summed up in one word: VOTES. These greedy politicians who are so ensconced in their thrones that they couldn't fathom losing their power and going out to actually get a real job, have allowed an innocent baby to be destroyed by a woman who didn't want to be "punished with a baby." Thank you, Earl Warren and company. Thank you Planned Parenthood. Thank you Margaret Sanger.

And the downfall of civilization continues.

23 January 2009

President Obama makes good on his promise to Planned Parenthood

President Obama marked the 36th anniversary of the most bone-headed decision in Supreme Court history by confiscating more taxpayer dollars to send overseas in the fight to kill as many babies as possible. From FOXNews:
President Obama will issue an executive order on Thursday reversing the Bush administration policy that bans the use of federal dollars by non-govermental organizations that discuss or provide abortions outside of the United States.

Obama will sign the executive order on the 36th anniversary of the landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion in all 50 states.

The policy, known in governmental circles as the "Mexico City policy," requires any non-governmental organization to agree before receiving U.S. funds that they will "neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations."

The language was announced at the United Nations International Conference on Population in 1984, and was approved by President Reagan and originally drafted by his assistant secretary of state, Alan Keyes. Keyes ran unsuccessfully as the GOP nominee against Obama for the U.S. Senate in 2004.

President George Herbert Walker Bush continued Reagan's Mexico City policy.

President Bill Clinton issued an executive order lifting the ban on Jan. 22, 1993. President George W. Bush issued an executive order re-instating the ban on federal dollars for NGOs that discuss or provide abortions on Jan. 22, 2001.

Planned Butchery is hailing this decision, since it will drastically benefit their bottom line.

05 February 2008

Planned Parenthood isn't trying to indoctrinate your children. Really, they're not! Well, maybe they are...

For anyone who doesn't think that the goal of Planned Parenthood is to make sure your 12-year-old girl gets her abortion on schedule, here's proof they do. This video (HT: ReformationNation) was produced by Planned Parenthood Golden Gate (San FranSchizo, CA). Watch the video (about 10:00 long), then read below.




Notice how the pro-lifers are evil zombies and sleazy senators, and how PPGG thinks murdering them is just so funn-nnyyyyy!!! And how did you like the girl who said, "I don't plan on getting an STD." Uh, yeah, good thinking! How many kids have said that and woke up one morning with some disease they didn't have before? "I don't plan on getting an STD." Boy, some role model for kids, huh?

And did you notice what the name of the "pro-choice superhero" was? Yeah, that sounds like something Planned Parenthood wants kids to get into. After all, what better way to get them pregnant so they can talk them into an abortion?

Folks, if you haven't figured it out by now, Planned Parenthhod is a sleazy operation run by people who couldn't care less about your children.

21 September 2007

More fraud from Planned Parenthood

I posted on this recently. Then today I found this video at ReformationNation. It shows how the people of Aurora, Illinois caught on to their scam and are fighting back.

13 September 2007

Planned Parenthood Express: Killing unborn children in less than an hour

Jill Stanek, writing for World News Daily, details how Planned Parenthood (motto: "More dead babies equals more money for us!") is stepping up their efforts to monoploize the baby-killing business:
Planned Parenthood launched the plan in 2002 by opening Planned Parenthood Expresses in target locations across the country. They now number 42. Expresses are easily established in strip or shopping malls without need to fulfill zoning or building requirements.

Expresses are abortion cullers. They sell illicit sex, sell unguaranteed methods to avoid consequences of illicit sex, sell mop-ups for their anticipated failures, and restart the process.

Expresses can handle STD mop-ups, but they can't handle the Big A. These are handed off to specialized PP clinics that comply with zoning and building requirements.

PP is already the largest abortion provider in the U.S., but that isn't enough. Step 2 of the five-year plan was to build more, for which expresses provided the increased market.

Problem is, once word got out, and the pro-life crowd in many cities strated protesting, PP had to start lying about who they were and what they were doing. Not that PP doesn't know how to lie, they've been doing it for years.
But pro-lifers interrupted Step 2 in 2003. They developed a new strategy. Led by concrete contractor Chris Danze, they initiated a boycott of construction workers, equipment and supplies throughout the building of a $6.2 million Planned Parenthood mill in Austin, Texas.

The boycott didn't stop construction, but it significantly stalled it, created a lot of bad press for PP and most eye-opening, revealed pro-lifers wield great influence in local communities.

[...]

Planned Parenthood's response was in hindsight predictable. PP determined to build its other new mills on the sly. It bought property in Denver, Colo., and Aurora, Ill., and who knows where else in secret. It got busted in Denver before ground broke, but not in Aurora.

Throughout and after purchasing land in Aurora, PP hid behind a shell corporation it created, Gemini Office Development (acronym purposeful?).

PP and Gemini lied on multiple Aurora permit documents when entering into the building phase in 2006. As recently as March 2007, Gemini wrote on a permit its tenant was "unknown at this time."

Planned Parenthood doesn't care about women's "reproductive health," or anything like it. All they care about is money. Get 'em in, suck the child out, send 'em home. If they bleed to death, or they die from sepsis or peritonitis a month later, well, that ain't Planned Parenthood's fault because, hey, it wasn't an abortion death. Next please!

(linked at Stop the ACLU)

16 May 2007

What is Planned Parenthood so afraid of?

A few days ago I posted about how Planned Parenthood was caught telling a girl posing as a 15-year old to fake her age so that (1) she could get and abortion, (2) her "boyfriend" wouldn't have to go to jail, and (3) the abortionist could get some more money in his pocket. Well, apparently Planned Parenthood doesn't cotton too well to being PWN3D. According to the Christian Post:
Planned Parenthood, the leading provider of surgical abortions, has threatened to file a lawsuit against an 18-year-old student journalist at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

Lilia Rose, who is the student editor and founder of the student pro-life magazine The Advocate, was contacted by the pro-choice organization after she recorded herself going into a clinic in Santa Monica, Calif., posing as a 15-year-old pregnant girl. She went in for an “abortion” with a man named James O’Keefe, who acted as her 23-year-old boyfriend, which would be considered statutory rape.

The tapes reveal that she was advised by employees to invent a birthday, so she did not appear to be 15, making her situation legal. A letter from Planned Parenthood expressed to her that she had no right to tape the incident, and that she did so without their consent.
You know what the irony is here? That Planned Parenthood doesn't think that minors should have to get consent from their parents before they enter into a butcher shop abortion clinic. But, when it comes to exposing Planned Parenthood for the monsters they are, then consent is everything.

The Post goes on to mention:
According to Rose, Planned Parenthood has had numerous incidences in the past.

One such example occurred when Life Dynamics, a Texas-based non-profit organization, hired an actress to make approximately 800 phone calls to abortion facilities across several states, acting as a 13-year-old girl. (Watch the video) She described herself as a victim of sexual assault, but 91 percent of the locations that admitted the action was a crime agreed to conceal it.
And yet none of these places is prosecuted. None of these places is investigated by any governmental agency. Women die every day from abortions. Many more are harmed for life. Butchers who maim these women simply pack up and move on to a new town, set up shop, and start their butchery all over again. And the government isn't doing a thing about it. That's why the world needs more young people like Lilia Rose, who isn't afraid to take on the Planned Parenthood machine, and expose them for who they are.

Planned Parenthood is scared. They and their like are going down the tubes, Roe v. Wade is coming ever so much closer to being overturned, and abortionists are fixin' to see their businesses crash and burn in a fiery heap. And they're scared. And they should be.